- From: =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:34:37 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2018 01:35:02 UTC
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 01/09/2018 07:30 PM, =Drummond Reed wrote: > > A DID ledger is a simple generic way to refer to "a distributed > > system that supports a DID method". For example, for the BTCR > > method, Bitcoin is the DID ledger. For the uPort DID method, Ethereum > > is the DID ledger. For the Sovrin DID method, Sovrin is the DID > > ledger. > > ... or that... :) - I note that we don't define "DID ledger" in our > specs, IIRC. Don't know if it adds enough for us to formally define it > (again, the goal being to keep the amount of terminology one has to > learn to understand what we're doing down to a minimum). I agree. At the Boston RWOT meeting, the generic term we had decided to use was simply "target system", i.e., a DID is registered/resolved using a DID method that operates against a specified target system. That target system could be anything from a blockchain or distributed ledger to a decentralized file system like IPFS.
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2018 01:35:02 UTC