Re: [RESENDING] Review of the current draft DID specification

>
> What's the best way to proceed? I'm not sure... ...keep creating new
> issues? ...write a lengthy position paper? ... create a new PR?
>
IMO, it depends on the depth of the issues. If we're talking about verbiage
problems, issues make sense. If we're talking about fundamental conceptual
problems that run through the whole spec, then maybe a paper linked to a
tracking issue might be better.