- From: Kevin O'Brien <kevin@kiva.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:16:47 -0800
- To: gilang@idblockchain.network
- Cc: Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJmx4NwXNM2VP2cQUh3RuKhj94k1Ck6EuUvk_CUr2P39FAE68A@mail.gmail.com>
I like the concept, thanks for sharing. One thing I've wondered is where the perceived costs are in such a system, thus leading to a need to monetize at all, but that comes from my non-profit perspective. In our case, we could have volunteers running nodes. However, we'd likely need some paid folks to handle recovery / fraud resolution cases. Have others thought about where the main costs are (asides ongoing development costs of the underlying tech) ? On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:09 AM Gilang Bhagaskara <gilang@idblockchain.network> wrote: > Hi, this is my first time posting here, I joined hoping to learn and > contribute to this group. I'm relatively new to decentralized identities > and self sovereignty, so I hope that the topic I am bringing up is not too > far from the ideals and goals of this group. > > I want to share a concept design where a business running self-sovereign > identity services can monetize, with the following diagram as an > explanation. (sorry if it looks ugly) > > [image: image.png] > (use https://snag.gy/JB9SNa.jpg if picture is not available) > > Basically the business will be supported by a consortium of companies > running blockchain nodes, where the SSI company will channel its profit to > the consortium members. > > 1. Main source of income is from companies utilizing SSI services and > paying yearly subscriber fee for their users (in USD) > 2. Government bodies can use the services with a discounted rate, up > to 100% for identity issuer > 3. 50% of the profit the company receives is distributed among > consortium members > 4. Portions received by consortium members is different depending on > the deal with the SSI company > 5. Consortium members can also utilize the services for their > business, converting the profit sharing into discount rate for subscription > fee if the value is still viable > 6. Government can join consortium, also receiving the profit sharing > 7. Government (or other companies) can give grant to the ecosystem, > either directly to the SSI company or to the consortium > > What do you think? Has this concept been realized before? What are the > pros and cons of this concept? Thoughts and questions are welcome. > > Regards, > Gilang >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2018 18:17:22 UTC