Your lists are excellent, and in my opinion can form the basis of what we list as distinguishing characteristics of DIDs as compared with other existing solutions. Very few of the properties are valuable in isolation, but when combined they are quite powerful. --- dan On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool! > > But what do you think about the lists I assembled? Are the items valid? > > *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP > *In Turn Information Management Consulting* > > o +1 650.209.7542 > m +1 250.888.9474 > 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 > AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com > *https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a>* > *Digital Identity | International Standards | Information Security * > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:27 PM Christopher Allen < > ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > >> A reference that hasn't come up before — we also might want to look at >> the draft (nearly final) from last #RebootingWebOfTrust for ideas on how to >> talk about DIDs: >> >> "How to Convince Dad* of the Importance of Self-Sovereign Identity (* and >> your sister and your daughter and your best friend and your nephew)" >> >> >> https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot7/blob/master/draft-documents/convincing-dad.md >> >> -- Christopher Allen >> >
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2018 22:13:08 UTC