- From: Ehud Shapiro אהוד שפירא <ehud.shapiro@weizmann.ac.il>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:22:53 +0200
- To: Gasser Linus <linus.gasser@epfl.ch>
- Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>, "nikkolasg@gmail.com" <nikkolasg@gmail.com>, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>, Ford Bryan <bryan.ford@epfl.ch>, Kokoris Kogias Eleftherios <eleftherios.kokoriskogias@epfl.ch>, Borge Chavez Maria Fernanda <maria.borgechavez@epfl.ch>, Jovanovic Philipp <philipp.jovanovic@epfl.ch>, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>, Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>
- Message-ID: <CAPpwrpGyJzjXKj671bBNah4vFjc_FRRQdW_OpkZkwDQ5jZOR8w@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Christopher, Linus and All, Thanks for setting up this interesting discussion. I would like to put it in a slightly broader context, not to sidetrack it, but as background for a possible future discussion. I think there is a need for at least three types of Distributed Identities: 1. Anonymous 2. Pseudonymous (unique) 3. Public (unique and honest) Who needs a Public DID? For start, the 2Bn+ users of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn...who are now locked into using a proprietary and centralized form of a Public Identity. For a general discussion of the need for Public Identities, see Tim Berners-Lee recent piece <https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/PublicIdentity.html>. For a discussion of their need in the context of e-democracy, see my recent piece <https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/8/229759-point/pdf>. I am looking forward to the discussion today on Pseudonymous DIDs, and hope to have in the future a discussion of Public DIDs. Best regards, Udi On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Gasser Linus <linus.gasser@epfl.ch> wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > I finally updated and slimmed down my presentation for PoP-parties. I > attached the PDF to this mail: > > > > The slides 21 and after are just there in case of questions. I plan to > talk for 10-15 minutes, and then we have time for discussion. Is this OK > like that? > > Linus > > > On 5 Aug 2018, at 01:10, Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@ > lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > > *TL;DR: Report from DWeb Summit; Proof of Personhood Discussion* > > NEXT MEETING: > > Tuesday, August 7th, 2018 > Time: 12pm Boston, 9am Pacific, 16:00 GMT > Text Chat: http://irc.w3.org/?channels=ccg > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#ccg > Voice: See updated instructions: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/ > w3c-ccg.github.io/blob/master/connecting.md > VoIP: sip:ccg@96.89.14.196 > US phone: tel:+1.540.274.1034;6306 <+1.540.274.1034;6306> > EU phone: tel:+33.9.74.59.31.06;6306 <+33.9.74.59.31.06;6306> > We prefer people to dial in via SIP when possible. > > Duration: 60 minutes > > Minutes from last call: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2018-07-24/ > > PROPOSED AGENDA: > > 1. IP Note: Anyone can participate in these calls. However, if you > have not agreed to the groups IP policy, we cannot consider substantive > contributions. (1 minute) > 2. Queuing in IRC (2 minute) > 1. We use IRC to queue speakers during the call as well as to take > minutes > 2. q+ to add yourself to queue (with optional reminder, e.g., “q+ > DID spec needs better SEO” > 3. If you’re not on IRC, simply ask to be put on the queue. > 4. Please be brief so the rest of the queue get a chance to chime > in. You can always q+ again. > 3. Connections Check & Scribe Selection (3 minutes) > 1. Scribe List: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > 1LkqZ10z7FeV3EgMIQEJ9achEYMzy1d_2S90Q_lQ0y8M/edit?usp=sharing > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LkqZ10z7FeV3EgMIQEJ9achEYMzy1d_2S90Q_lQ0y8M/edit?usp=sharing> > ) > 4. Agenda Review (2 minutes) > 5. Introductions & Reintroductions (4 minutes) (see scribe doc for > reintroduce column) > 6. Announcements & Reminders (5 minutes) > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/announcements/ > 1. MYDATA 2018 — August 29-31 Helsinki, Finland > 2. #RebootingWebOfTrust VII — September 26-28th, Toronto (NOTE > change from 24th) > 3. TPAC — October 23rd-26th, Lyon, France > https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/ <https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/> > 4. IIW — October 23rd-25th, Mountain View > http://iiw.idcommons.net > 7. Progress on Current Action Items (5 min) > https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues?q=is%3Aissue+ > is%3Aopen+label%3A%22action+item%22 > <https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22action+item%22> > 8. Status of Work Items (5 min) > https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/blob/master/work_items.md > 9. DWeb Summit Report Out (5 min) > A number our members demonstrated apps at the DWeb Summit last week > https://decentralizedweb.net/ — any lessons or action items? > 10. Proof of Personhood (25 min) > > Discussion with Brian Ford and team about “Proof of Personhood” > > - https://www.zerobyte.io/publications/2017-BKJGGF-pop.pdf > - http://ww.bford.info/log/2007/0327-PseudonymParties.pdf > > Potential related materials: > > - https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/accountable-pseudonyms- > socialnets08.pdf > - https://artis.eco/en/faq > > > Next week: Review of https://jolocom.com/ approach to decentralized > digital identity, including their DID and VC implementation > > — W3C-CCG Co-Chairs: Christopher Allen, Kim Hamilton Duffy & Joe Andrieu > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2018 14:43:32 UTC