- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:29:04 +0000
- To: Adam Migus <adam@migusgroup.com>, "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 00:29:47 UTC
It would be good if we could also analyse impacts based upon some form of 'dignity' matrix. Privacy can often be used to prevent access of a person to the person, with 'official' processing requirements. in Australia Freedom of Information Laws result in requests being processed in a 50 day window, which if the information is critical to an issue that needs to be dealt with immediately; isn't really a timely manner to get that information and thereafter be able to use it for 'dignity preserving' means. Dignity includes the concept of confidentiality, and is a term used in the UDHR[1] Tim. [1] http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 at 02:58 Adam Migus <adam@migusgroup.com> wrote: > Hey everyone, > Sorry for the delay - I wanted to make sure I had the latest versions > before sending them out. Here are the NIST Privacy Risk Assessment > Methodology (PRAM) worksheets. The worksheets constitute a process flow > based on NIST.IR..8062[1]. It's geared towards assessing a technology > solution but as discussed, we can 'adapt' it to analyze #vctf use-cases. > > 1. http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2017/NIST.IR.8062.pdf > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 00:29:47 UTC