- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:12:15 +0200
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
On 2017-06-02 10:10, Timothy Holborn wrote: > Who were the identified contributors to the work that went to WG? > > Did it reflect the contributors involved over the entire lifecycle or more simply, the most recent version...? > > I think an open letter on digital identity for citizens to use to send to their elected Parliamentarians is a better pathway. Since governments have equally different ideas* concerning identity as people subscribed to this list seem to have, that would be a mighty huge letter :-) I believe creating a WG without having a fairly well-defined platform for an extremely fuzzy topic like "identity" is complete nonsense. FWIW, I recently got (off-list) a VC platform paper from one the list subscribers which actually appeared quite workable. Anders * France is a wonderful example. They claim that SSNs are against citizen liberties but anyway recently introduced a nation-wide biometric database although 9 out of 10 organizations were against it.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2017 09:12:52 UTC