- From: Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:56:45 -0400
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPS+YFK6qb_mjvwgS0WQfo=xssw9xGPW72=Fpsct08nDXErTyg@mail.gmail.com>
I originally called it "Promise Markup Language" in 2007. It's the result of many years experience: degree in accounting, 20+ years of software development, trading professionally with a Series 7, 63, 55, and 20 years of studying the monetary system. It's based on contract law, but separates and clarifies concepts for a computer. Human readable and provides a audit trail. The slavery problem is huge and the above was designed to solve it permanently on earth. I, personally, identify and understand this: Father stares at the hand and foot of his five-year-old, severed as a punishment for failing to make the daily rubber quota, Belgian Congo, 1904 http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/father-hand-belgian-congo-1904/ The father in the above photo is sitting quietly pondering his options. He became a very good supervisor and was promoted at work. Severing the hand and foot of his 5 year old, creates a very obedient slave. Middle management was certainly rewarded for creating such productivity in the workers. The same occurs today in the IT industry. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 at 00:41 Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Timothy, >> >> I understand the problem very well. I am a victim of it. >> >> I designed a common language for ALL transactions on earth to escape >> slavery. >> >> >> >> Please review it again. I know more about all of this than you. >> > > be careful with your assumptions. > > >> >> http://34.208.7.206/ContractsPage.aspx >> > > whats this based on? > >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Timothy Holborn < >> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> um... The problem is quite significant, and it is important not to >> over-simplify the problem and/or the solution for it. >> >> >> Andrew Macleod spoke about this problem at the 'Trust Factory' event. Some >> links about him: Andrew Macleod >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEy4ZJ4q7vA> Mining & Impact Capital >> <https://vimeo.com/124909602>, TED Development Investment >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW-tJflFoE4>, Terrorism & Global Affairs >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQkMrBJjPSk> >> >> Search using the following keywords for more info: >> >> - "United Nations" "food for sex" >> - "United Nations" "sexual abuse" >> - "United Nations" "child rape" >> - "United Nations" pedophilia >> >> With respect to 'modern slavery', i also highlight: https://www. >> wearethorn.org/ noting that whilst the position of this video >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBZdRe8cheQ&feature=youtu.be&t=1h8m21s is >> another important problem to solve, that the broader video will help you >> understand the scope of these sorts of problems... >> >> If Facebook, Google, etc. want to Manage ID and do the biometric analysis >> so they can use facial recognition for commercial purposes as though >> they're process is making the best opportunities for humans on the planet. I >> think, well. they're not serving vulnerable people very well. a very high >> opportunity cost put upon humanity in exchange for 'free' services (on paid >> internet). >> >> 'rethinking good guys vs. bad guys'... great concept. >> >> I've been working for years in poverty on global open standards >> technologies that are difficult to commercialise for people such as >> myself. That kinda makes me an investor, but we don't have the >> 'blockchain' for that either, yet. >> >> People should be rewarded more for doing the right thing than they are >> for knowingly doing otherwise. The example provided above shows how deep >> the rot has gone. It's simply not acceptable. knowledge economy should >> enhance socio-economic participation whilst being provisioned in a 'dignity >> enhancing' manner that supports most of all, safety, health and welfare. >> >> Tim.h. >> >> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 at 00:20 Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Ambiguity in contracts is the root problem. People sign contracts they >> don't understand or get trapped, then resort to sex to pay it off. >> Predators take advantage of that naivety. Language and cultural >> miscommunications are perpetuated to create contracts for that result. >> >> Solution >> A common language for all contracts and transactions. It prevents >> ambiguity, provides accountability, transparency, and respects privacy. >> This is based on contract law and works in all languages and cultures for >> barter and currency transactions: http://34.208.7.206/ContractsPage.aspx >> . >> >> Event-based smart contract to describe any contract or transaction. It's >> precise enough for computers and human readable. See the stock market >> examples and notice the identical data structure for both bid and ask. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Timothy Holborn < >> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Heres a problem worth fixing. >> http://www.bbc.com/news/world-33089662 >> >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:57:21 UTC