I would have thought the "fake news" Saga would have given the efforts a
new use-case.
On Tue., 15 Nov. 2016, 2:29 am Manu Sporny, <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:
> The W3C Advisory Board discussed whether or not Verifiable Claims are
> ready for a Working Group during a recent meeting. Note that three of of
> the ten Advisory Board members are the same people/orgs that remain
> skeptical of the Verifiable Claims work: Chris Wilson (Google), Mike
> Champion (Microsoft), and Tantek Çelik (Mozilla).
>
> Some of you will not be able to see the minutes from the meeting as they
> are W3C Member Only. The AB Minutes of the discussion around Verifiable
> Claims are here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/31-ab-minutes.html#item04
>
> Mike Champion is also questioning whether or not there is enough buy in
> and implementation experience in the payments and retail space here:
>
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments-comments/2016Nov/0022.html
>
> Bob, Jay, you guys may want to weigh in on that email noting the sort of
> implementation experience that each of your organizations have in the
> digital coupon space and your desire to support the verifiable claims
> work in your implementations. DavidE, I don't know if you want to
> mention anything on behalf of Verifone? Jay, does your committee at GS1
> want to weigh in on this?
>
> Web Payments IG, payments are being placed on the chopping block wrt.
> Verifiable Claims. Do any other IG members want to assert support for
> this work? Wasn't the Web Payments IG already clear about their desires?
>
> Richard, Matt, can we put a short agenda item on tomorrow's Verifiable
> Claims call about this?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
>
>