- From: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:52:53 -0400
- To: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+Enjb+uhs6y_oZy_4iNHRf=SXNOaTruJYgWT8FvrB886gOd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net> wrote: > On 5/24/16 7:34 AM, Daniel Burnett wrote: > >> Group, >> >> >> I have updated the data model specification draft based on last week's >> discussion. As before, the document can be found at >> >> http://opencreds.org/specs/source/claims-data-model/ >> > > For me, this reads well (the Abstract in particular), down as far as > section 3.1, with one exception. > > In the Abstract this sentence: > "People are often able to establish trust by demonstrating that others > have made valuable claims about their identities." > > The word 'valuable' seemed wrong to me ... -- valuable to who, in what way? > > I was expecting 'verifiable' there; is there a reason why it can't be used > -- "verifiable claims about their identities". Or "checkable" > > Or, if what you want to get at is the basis of that verifiability, then > the respect or trust of the 'other', which is then bundled into the claim > that they make, is the real source. > > So maybe instead something like: > > "People are often able to establish trust by demonstrating that respected > others have made claims about their identities." > Good suggestion. I have made this change in the document. > > > In section 3.1, I became hopelessly confused. > > At first I was just confused, but I came back and tried that section again > a few hours later, and now it's hopeless. ;-) . I'm sorry to hear that. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions :) > > > Steven > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 14:53:22 UTC