+1 for "Holder" - Eric said, "I hold my credentials in my wallet". ;-) <https://mail.google.com/> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 03/30/2016 10:34 AM, Varn, Richard J wrote: > >> We call the actor about whom the claim is made an “earner” as they >> earned the claim in some fashion This may not work for all uses >> descriptively but it has a positive sound to it. >> > > It does have a nice positive ring to it for certain scenarios. However, > it's true that it doesn't work for many cases, such as place of birth, > age, citizenship, address, email, and so on (though I suppose you could > argue that some of those may be "earned" in some sense!). I think > "holder" is working for that actor for most people in the more generic > case. But others can correct me if they feel differently. > > We use “consumer” for the one who uses an earner’s claim so plus one >> there. The source of the evidence for the claim is from the >> “issuer” of the claim (this is where I really miss being able to say >> credential). >> > > I think we'll be able to say a credential is a set of verifiable claims. > It's the container for claims. > > > -- > Dave Longley > CTO > Digital Bazaar, Inc. > http://digitalbazaar.com > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:06:20 UTC