- From: Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:56:23 -0500
- To: John Tibbetts <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com>
- Cc: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <CAMX+RnD+XTh3aUXbfFqDHLxEv+RAuMk6igdM7+zhjkPwHDFvhg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 JT We should focus on the "what" not the "how". Eric <https://mail.google.com/> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:10 AM, John Tibbetts <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion Tim, > > However I don’t think that’s what a ‘use case’ is. A use case is a bare > bones user experience. In the style of use case that our current use case > document follows (and also that we follow at Vitalsource) a bogus user is > specifically named—and if Shane’s writing the use case with a clever name. > > I think what you’re talking about is a design sketch and that is what > we’re specifically enjoined *not* to do in this document. > > (And even if we were I still don’t know enough about the > behind-the-curtain machinery that we’re heading for). > > Cheers, > > John > > > On Mar 11, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > > if at all possible, > > I'd like to see it broken down into a group of creds that represent both a > package of verifiable claims, in addition to a subset or indeed an element > of a broader claim capable by the entity seeking to make a claim in a > privacy preserving manner that still supports validation of the necessary > particulars (and identification of those who want more, beyond reasonable > purposes).. > > Tim. > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 at 00:41 Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> On Mar 10, 2016 9:03 PM, "John Tibbetts" <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’ve slightly reworked a use case I turned in earlier that is a tad more >>> in line with Shane’s Use Case style. Feel free to use it if you find it >>> helpful or modify it to suit your needs. >>> >>> >>> *Joleen is the registrar of Mega University and, by virtue of her >>> office, is responsible for the integrity, accuracy, and security of >>> academic records. Joleen has been a pioneering registrar in advocating an >>> 'extended transcript' that includes not only the standard set of course >>> grades but also adds supplementary information on learner competencies. >>> These might include work experiences and non-educational but marketable >>> skills. Upon the request of her students Joleen issues digital credentials >>> that encapsulates an extended transcript.* >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> John >>> >>> >
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 15:57:11 UTC