- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:17:26 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
> On 13 Jun 2016, at 02:19, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 06/12/2016 04:32 PM, David Chadwick wrote: >> I believe the latest definition of claim in the architecture >> document >> >> http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/architecture/ >> >> is fundamentally wrong. It says >> >> Claim A statement made by an entity about a subject. For example: >> "Jane is a doctor." >> >> The example is not one claim, but two claims. It claims that the >> subject is a doctor and that the subject is called Jane. We should >> rewrite this to say > > Hmm, not what I was going for... I was trying to avoid talking about > subject identifiers by just using "Jane" as the subject identifier. With a bit of Turtle (N3 actually is going to be more useful in this discussion as it allows one to make statements about graphs) this would be clear. I think Manu means the graph { :Jane a :Doctor . } which could for that matter also be { :x a :Doctor . } but not { :x a Doctor ; :name "Jane" } . (Btw. the { } notation makes it much clearer than JSON-LD, RDF/XML or other serialisation can since those do not have a specific syntax for quotation) > >> Claim A statement made by an entity about a holder. > > Unfortunately, this isn't accurate. Claims are made about subjects, > where the subject is the holder in the vast majority of cases. The > subject may not be the holder (for example, you holding on to a claim > made by a veterinarian about your pet). > > We could reword to: > > Claim: A statement made by an Issuer about a Subject. For example, > "A hospital (Issuer) says that Jane (Subject) is > a doctor (the claim)." Why not just: Claim: A statement made by an Issuer The reason I am asking is because what about when two people marry? :FriarTuck claims { :jane marriedTo :john . } Now the subject could be :jane or :john . But does it really matter? Either could present the claim, but so could a third party too, eg someone working in a registry could use that claim to write a third statement e.g. one about both living at a certain address. Anyway, just a question. Henry > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching > https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
Received on Monday, 13 June 2016 06:17:55 UTC