- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:19:42 +0200
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- CC: Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net>
- Message-ID: <551A90DE.3070406@wwelves.org>
On 03/31/2015 02:12 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 03/31/2015 01:29 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >> On 03/31/2015 01:04 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >>> On 03/31/2015 07:31 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: >>> >>>> 4. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update >>>> * Nate Otto, Sunny Lee >>>> * >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xQrBwK5tiggSWMXh7ByZ4acEjtMaIMgqyQey67fh5TQ/edit >>> >>> Howdy o/ >>> >>> I would like to discuss EXAMPLE 5 from the draft >>> * >>> http://specification.openbadges.org/credentials/#DefinedAchievementAssertion >>> >>> To my understanding we will continue discussing that in this PR >>> * https://github.com/openbadges/openbadges-specification/pull/31 >>> >>> Everyone interested, please read the example and converdation in PR. >> I also created gist for it >> https://gist.github.com/elf-pavlik/029917ccc535e889f693/a94253fcf366e633738ae8635e9c38154d59d57a >> >> but JSON-LD playground fails to load it :( >> * http://json-ld.org/playground/#/gist/029917ccc535e889f693 >> * >> http://json-ld.org/playground/#/gist/029917ccc535e889f693/a94253fcf366e633738ae8635e9c38154d59d57a >> >> I will add another revision of that gist proposing some modifications! > Nate, what do you think about this one? > https://gist.github.com/elf-pavlik/029917ccc535e889f693/7c6430cc6e45c74bb6ff17d58683db8124709c0f > > Let's continue this conversation in new issue on Github > "BadgeAssertion == AchievementCredential" > https://github.com/openbadges/openbadges-specification/issues/32 latest gist revision linked in relevant issue https://github.com/openbadges/openbadges-specification/issues/32#issuecomment-88064626
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 12:20:02 UTC