- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:33:43 +0100
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 2015-02-10 13:43, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > Hello Credentials CG participants, > > I would like to follow up with you on ACTION-2 which I took in Social IG > - "Discuss Social Profile Use Cases and Requirements with Credentials CG" > http://www.w3.org/Social/InterestGroup/track/actions/2 > > You can find most or even all of the relevant information aggregated by > the IG on > * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Profile_Use_Cases > > As well as relevant section in WG Social API User Stories page > * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Social_Profiles > > I see Social Profiles as very important part of W3C Social Activity and > believe we can find helpful synergies with work happening in Credentials > CG. Especially Accessing the Identity section in Identity Credentials > draft looks to me extremely relevant to work on Social API! > * > http://opencreds.org/specs/source/identity-credentials/#accessing-the-identity > > All your feedback warmly welcomed! IMO (as a grumpy old fart), nothing will really fly until we get client-based keys also holding the URL to your home-base. Like WebID-TLS but without the pain :-) Before we get that Facebook/Google will remain the login of choice. Cheers Anders > > Cheers :) >
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 06:34:22 UTC