- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:32:50 +0200
- To: "David I. Lehn" <dil@lehn.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: public-credentials@w3.org
On 2014-10-23 23:25, David I. Lehn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >>> I would recommend to re-phrase: >>> >>> If we can't reliably prove we're entitled to do things on the Web, >>> we're probably not doing important things on the web. >> >> Done: >> >> https://github.com/opencreds/website/commit/717f840c77667e839b3bb1b8fe5c66e9317dc67a >> > > -1 on the old and new wording: "If we can't reliably prove we're > entitled to do things on the Web, then we're probably not doing > important things on the Web." > > I'm not sure what that means, it makes no sense to me at first glance. > Of course you can do important things without proving you are entitled > to do so or who you are. I'm probably reading that wrong but others > will too. Need to reword that to, I think, say something about how > there are things that can't/shouldn't/etc be done on the web without > first proving who you are etc. Being "authorized" for a merchant may be only be an opaque token like in Apple Pay. I don't really see this in the current documents. Anders > > -dave >
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 04:33:29 UTC