Re: Draft Credentials Roadmap in Progress

On 12/20/14 3:44 PM, Leuba, Mark wrote:
> Steven,
>
> My apologies for the format issue, I have saved it as an Open
> Document Format (odt) and enclosed here, hoping that helps.

Thank you. I can access the odt, and I read it.

I like the examples, the first one especially which tells what will 
happen in detail.

I tried the link at the very bottom, and apparently there's an expired 
certificate at that link, and Firefox issued me various warnings which 
I didn't override. The main error message I got said:

"web-payments.org uses an invalid security certificate.
  The certificate expired on 12/20/14 3:59 PM. The current time is 
12/20/14 5:04 PM."

Steven


I use
> Google Docs and thought it would be suitable as it allowed for a
> degree of collaboration but I am definitely open to suggestions
> from the group to move it elsewhere.
>
> Here also is a shareable link,
> https://docs.google.com/a/pathway-technology.com/document/d/19pnLioDVOoTl5ScUHgf_Bj9gUpQBHyShrnDoY_uz20c/edit?usp=sharing
>  for those who may be able use it.
>
>
>
> *Mark Leuba* Managing Director Pathway Technology Partners
> 443.574.5401 www.linkedin.com/in/markleuba
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/markleuba> www.pathway-technology.com
> <http://www.pathway-technology.com>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Steven Rowat
> <steven_rowat@sunshine.net <mailto:steven_rowat@sunshine.net>>
> wrote:
>
> On 12/19/14 5:56 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>
> For those that may not have the proper handler to open Google Doc,
> it can be found here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/__document/d/__19pnLioDVOoTl5ScUHgf___Bj9gUpQBHyShrnDoY_uz20c/edit
>
>
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/19pnLioDVOoTl5ScUHgf_Bj9gUpQBHyShrnDoY_uz20c/edit>
>
>
>
> Aha. That link asks for a Google account. I deleted mine a while
> back...and don't have plans for another one in the near future.
>
> Any other way to get a look at the roadmap?
>
> I assume it will be published eventually on the web, after it's
> finished... — but still, it seems contradictory for the group to be
> working on an open standard, in theory transparently, and require a
> corporate account for one of the core working documents (if that's
> what's happening here).
>
> Steven Rowat
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 01:12:30 UTC