- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:55:09 -0700
- To: "public-covid-19@w3.org" <public-covid-19@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5e6bc8fb.1c69fb81.6afc7.9b06@mx.google.com>
Just as a way of scheduling our work, I would favor focusing on those with time to plan, and then prioritizing the advice for those who have less time to prepare. I’m still hoping we can attract the vendors of software or system administrators responsible for aiding educators and meeting planners to join and share their experiences. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/03/13/colleges-switch-to-online-teaching-but-distance-learning-for-schools-is-still-some-way-away/#37ce8642add6 On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:15:02 -0400 Joseph Potvin wrote: External measures to restrict travel and events in order to reduce the rate of COVID-19 spread are commonly not pre-announced, but in many scenarios event organizers/hosts have at least some flexibility to choose when to notify participating individuals and organizations that an in-person event must be cancelled or significantly postponed. In addition to taking account of event size, I suggest therefore to distinguish arrangements for transition times for events scheduled to start within: - 1-12 hours - 1 day - 2-7 days - 8-21 days - More than 21 days A working premise is that the target audience for these arrangements is comprised of event organizers and participants who determine that, one way or another, a genuine effort at an online event is preferred over outright cancellation or postponement. Joseph Potvin Mobile: 819-593-5983
Received on Friday, 13 March 2020 17:55:23 UTC