- From: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:55:01 +0900
- To: public-coremob@w3.org, bs3131@att.com
- CC: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
Hi Bryan, I fully agree with your view that network context and performance information will contribute a good UX. I believe that my proposal is closely related to Bandwidth awareness/Efficient network connection usage in that GSMA document and what I would like to discuss is how we can realize those guidelines in the context of W3C. Hope to have a good discussion, -- Hidetoshi Yokota Mobile Network Lab KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc. e-mail:yokota@kddilabs.jp (2012/10/23 10:32), SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: >> I already put my name on the supporter list ;-). When the agenda and >> subpage are created, I'll add my topic there. BTW, how should this >> session be related with Performance session (1.18)? Do you have any idea >> in mind? >> > > There's been a suggestion that they be sequential. I will look to the W3C staff to help arrange that. > > I think the intent of "network friendly" covers a variety of things and some of them overlap with the Performance session objectives, e.g. from [1] Network Measurements and Network Streaming Measurements. Others are about the effectiveness of apps in a variable network context, and touch on UX and resource efficiency. Network context and performance information can be important to both UX and efficiency. But what it takes to design an app that provides a good UX (a "smarter Webapp") goes well beyond system info and instrumentation. The intent of the session from my view was to consider how the GSMA guidelines in their broader scope relate to the features/techniques available to Web applications (and what more is needed), with perhaps a key aspect (but certainly not the only one) being resource efficiency. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/performance-workshop/ > > Thanks, > Bryan Sullivan > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 18:09:07 UTC