- From: Ron Itelman <ron@ronitelman.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:11:28 -0600
- To: public-context-graph@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL582Oc8htEyNwGRXgD=iXLvF8mvh0Zd5bW1FcdX0d_diMrP+g@mail.gmail.com>
A note on how the W3C Context Graph Community Group works — because transparency upfront saves everyone time. What we are: An open, volunteer innovation group under W3C standards. A community group can be started by anyone and is a protected space specifically designed to NOT require adhering to existing standards — allowing us to question anything and innovate freely. This group is focused on building a protocol for creating a graph of context at system boundaries. Your ideas. We mentor. Total creative freedom — but everything must be demonstrable and use the protocol. Why: You need a shared understanding of what "Context" is and how it is measured — in bits. So instead of a vague word, it has specificity. It's learnable and engineerable. The same thing happened when Shannon defined "Information" using uncertainty as its root. If you want to explain the difference between a Knowledge Graph that handles "Context" and a general, scale-free approach to measuring "Context" outside of any one vendor's implementation — this is your group. If you prefer an ontology approach and are open to a new perspective — this is also your group. If neither fits, the best way I can support you is to help you find the right one. What we aren't: A stage for individual pitches. A consensus-driven committee. A place to relitigate the fundamentals. How we collaborate: Q1: Learn the protocol fundamentals together Q2: Form innovation pairs and groups Q3+: Build and demo — for each other and the world The only technical requirement: your work must pass the validator. If it does, it combines with everyone else's. That's the guarantee. Is the math all figured out? No. Is my Decision Intelligence approach complete? No. I'm not imposing anything on any field or anyone — only a test: when you add information to your context graph, we have a standard definition and measurement. That's what guarantees everyone's work is combinable with yours. That's a specification worth building. I want to connect you all with the information, people, etc., you need for YOUR ideas to succeed. But it only works, if we can agree to a few principles. If it's worth your time to learn them, this is the right group. If not, you and the people around you will not be using your time effectively. That is what my goal is to protect: each other's right to innovate, learn, and succeed. Link to join in comments. *Don't miss our kickoff (round 2): Tuesday, March 31 · 12:00–1:00pm MST* ____ DETAILS: *To subscribe, use this link:* https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/c_db1de70c03fc4a76d5a3f4dc1d5145a6c469be2d9f148fd56019a9ca02933ea1@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics Then add it to your calendar: - *Google Calendar:* Settings → Add calendar → From URL → paste the link above - *Apple Calendar:* File → New Calendar Subscription → paste the link above - *Outlook:* Add calendar → Subscribe from web → paste the link above Once subscribed, you'll automatically see all our meetings with links and details. *To view in your browser without subscribing: * https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_db1de70c03fc4a76d5a3f4dc1d5145a6c469be2d9f148fd56019a9ca02933ea1%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FDenver
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: W3C_Context_Graph_Collaboration.pdf
Received on Friday, 27 March 2026 18:11:52 UTC