- From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:09:51 -0400
- To: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>
- CC: public-contacts-coord@w3.org, Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@google.com>
On 2010-09-10 05:45, Rich Tibbett wrote: >> Not in vCard *core*. A separate RFC will address this. The draft is here: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-vcarddav-vcard-extension-02 > > That is a very interesting proposal but not basing this around an > existing social contacts spec seems foolish (reinventing the formats > anyone?). Why is that? If this were to be based of the Portable Contacts > specification (proposed @ > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ContactFormatsComparison), we might just > begin to have a well-defined path between vCard and the more social > properties of the Portable Contacts spec. > > Who do I need to talk to within IETF to progress this idea and could the > editors be invited to join this discussion? To: draft-george-vcarddav-vcard-extension@tools.ietf.org Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 12:10:23 UTC