- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:18:57 -0500
- To: Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com>
- Cc: hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org>, public-community-io <public-community-io@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVrSHiV0HGYzjXetF+mFx69PFeAi1_COTNPagpg2grsmbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mark, thanks for the link. I'll keep it in mind. Early on I thought about visualization in layers to keep to make things a bit easier spatially (if I can recall correctly), I also thought about various hypergraphs and topic maps at one point. In addition, I'll admit that I am very interested in neuroscience. <1> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraph <2> http://topicmaps.org/ On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm feeling strongly about this. I also know some people who might be able > to help with this. > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Brent Shambaugh < > brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have a hunch a lot lies in things like Payswarm and Ripple. I mean it >> certainly is emotional for me. Payswarm can keep track of intentions, and >> Ripple allows of decentralized payment and may keep track of intentions. >> Something (experience and otherwise) is telling me to focus more on web >> payments. >> >> I've had a lot of problems with trying to look at everything to see >> patterns, try to avoid reinventing the wheel. Eventually, I concluded that >> to implement stuff I just needed to study more languages (but more, so it >> is looking like JavaScript) and if I was bothered by the theory or wanted >> help understanding how it would work best than CS stuff. It was all very >> confusing. >> >> Can I safely ditch https://www.coursera.org/course/hci (Human-Computer >> Interaction), https://www.coursera.org/course/pgm (Probabilistic >> Graphical Models), https://www.coursera.org/course/bigdata (Web >> Intelligence and Big Data), https://www.coursera.org/course/gamification(Gamification) and put it on the shelf for now? Clearly building a >> distributed economy is a massive undertaking, and these things could >> certainly come into play. Money, or at least some record of exchange, >> appears to be a very important part. Knowing this to build something may >> not be necessary. >> >> I'd like to commit more time to this, and obviously I have to focus in >> order to do that. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Creating a usable barter system also requires actions be accompolished >>> *early* in time. >>> >>> Here is my vision of such a system: >>> >>> First of all, this requires something I call either a "Production >>> Arena", or (less often) a "Vertically Integrated Permaculture Mosaic". >>> >>> The Production Arena (or VIPM) is the interlocking Physical Sources such >>> as land and water rights and plants and animals and tools and other things >>> needed to create a "Basic Outcome" for all the participants. >>> >>> And so we attract middle-to-upper-income investors to supply the money >>> to buy these Physical Sources for an advertised return of organic goods and >>> services in the future - though they will actually be receiving >>> co-ownership in the Production Arena, and receiving the goods and services >>> as a 'side-effect' of that co-ownership. In this way we eliminate the >>> buying and selling of those goods and services. >>> >>> And we must also attract middle-to-lower-income investors to >>> cross-commit their *future* labor in return for co-ownership in the >>> Production Arena. >>> >>> By "cross-commit" I mean each worker will promise to work in a specific >>> part of the Production Arena (say milking cows) in return for receiving >>> co-ownership in many other parts of the Production Arena needed to supply >>> him with all of his basic needs. >>> >>> I need to refine how I explain this, because there is a bit more to it >>> that I did not include in the above... >>> >>> Each investors (whether committing money or future labor) will usually >>> receive a 'bundle' of property-rights *and* commitments from others to >>> perform the future labor necessary to accomplish that production. >>> >>> For example, the cow-milker would usually receive both ownership in the >>> dentist office *and* commitments from the dentist to fix his teeth in the >>> future when necessary. >>> >>> When used in conjunction these commitments create the kind of security >>> that insurance pretends to deliver. I sometimes call it "life assurance". >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Brent Shambaugh >> >> I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching >> how to build better economies. >> Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- > Brent Shambaugh > > I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching > how to build better economies. > Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com > -- Brent Shambaugh I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching how to build better economies. Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 06:19:27 UTC