- From: <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:58:37 +0000
- To: Oscar Cao <oscar.cao@live.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Dear Oscar Cao ,
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the
comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the
Understanding WCAG 2.0 published on 11 Sep 2014. Thank you for having taken
the time to review the document and to send us comments!
The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before March 26,
2015. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.
Thanks,
For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
Michael Cooper
W3C Staff Contact
1. http://www.w3.org/mid/E1YImrq-000Bme-Ro@maia.w3.org
2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140911/
=====
Your comment on :
> I think the choice of words selected to replace 'web page' ('document'
> and 'program') is not the best choice of words to use. I believe the
> word 'screen' is much more appropriate. As we are already using that
> word and it is used in every software development practice and not just
> websites/web apps. In addition, the choice to use 'software program' I
> believe is too large of a unit to measure.
>
> Proposed Change:
> use the word 'screen' and/or 'set of screens' for defining the unit of
> measure.
Working Group Resolution (LC-2995):
Thanks for your comment. Comments on WCAG2ICT are requested to be sent to
the public-wcag2ict-comments@w3.org mailing list, so we are forwarding your
comment to that list.
----
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 14:58:38 UTC