W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates ( LC-2872)

From: <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 03:23:14 +0000
Message-Id: <E1WFxkg-0001Vt-VF@jessica.w3.org>
To: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org,Philip Ackermann <philip.ackermann@fit.fraunhofer.de>, Evangelos Vlachogiannis <evangelos.vlachogiannis@fit.fraunhofer.de>, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
 Dear Carlos A Velasco ,

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the
comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Techniques
for WCAG 2.0 published on 16 Jan 2014. Thank you for having taken the time
to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before
02/25/2014. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during
the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation


For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
Michael Cooper
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/52D8E2C4.2090001@fit.fraunhofer.de
 2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/


Your comment on :
> Dear Shawn, dear group,
> The major question that we have as developers of accessibility 
> evaluation tools is whether the XML source documents [1]
> are also updated synchronously with this and future releases of the 
> techniques' documents.
> It would also be very important for us to find out whether the 
> repository [2] can also be considered as the official techniques 
> repository. And whether GitHub can also be used to report issues. We 
> would welcome such approach to support traceability of any change.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/sources/
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Dr Carlos A Velasco
>    Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
>    Web Compliance Center: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/
>    Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
>    Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609

Working Group Resolution (LC-2872):
Thank you for your comment.  We have moved the location of the source
documents for WCAG techniques (as well as the understanding documents and
the WCAG standard itself) to GitHub.  This is the official repository.

These source documents are updated as part of the process of updating the
public HTML versions of these documents, and thus will be in sync with the
technique document releases.  It is worth noting that there will also need
to be at least one development branch for these documents so the main
branch can represent the current public stable version and the development
branch can be modified leading up to an update.

Regarding reporting issues via GitHub, people are welcome to submit issues
or make modifications to the source documents on a local copy and submit
pull requests.  The working group will review issues and pull requests for
non-editorial issues, but simple editorial pull requests may be accepted by
the editors.

Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 03:23:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:59 UTC