W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2014

Re: G200: Opening new windows and tabs from a link only when necessary ( LC-2874)

From: <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 03:23:15 +0000
Message-Id: <E1WFxkh-0001Vw-1F@jessica.w3.org>
To: Devarshi Pant <devarshipant@gmail.com>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
 Dear Devarshi Pant ,

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the
comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Techniques
for WCAG 2.0 published on 16 Jan 2014. Thank you for having taken the time
to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before
02/25/2014. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during
the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
Michael Cooper
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJGQbjt-9S749MKsmCOgjFL1gY2EpABwbfZ6eBjB_xOVfpxUcg@mail.gmail.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/


=====

Your comment on :
> G200: Opening new windows and tabs from a link only when necessary
> url: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/G200.html
> 
> Under description:
> A. What does 'outside of the secured scope' imply in #2?
> B. 'It is recommend' should be 'It is recommended.'


Working Group Resolution (LC-2874):
Thank you for the comment.  We have modified the wording of the sentence in
question (changed scope to "area")

The user is logged into a secured area of a site, and following a  link to
a page outside of the secured area would terminate the user's logon.

We have also corrected the grammatical error mentioned in part B of your
comment.

Thanks again for your comment!

----
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 03:23:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:17 UTC