- From: <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:59:32 +0000
- To: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Dear Sailesh Panchang , The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Techniques for WCAG 2.0 published on 6 Mar 2014. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 1 May 2014. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group, Michael Cooper W3C Staff Contact 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/E1WXvG4-0001a3-TY@stuart.w3.org 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140306/ ===== Your comment on ARIA1: Using the aria-describedby property to provide a descriptive label ...: > The technique's title is 'Using the aria-describedby property to provide > a descriptive label for user interface controls'. > But the intent / objective is much wider and refers to 'descriptive > info' for UI controls. > > > Proposed Change: > Change title for ARIA1 to: > Using the aria-describedby property to associate related description for > user interface controls' > (Or 'detailed' in place of 'related'). Working Group Resolution (LC-2918): Thank you for your comment. The working group does not feel that the title and the description are inconsistent so will leave the title as it is currently. ----
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 21:59:34 UTC