- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:34:51 -0500
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, wai@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 16:35:21 UTC
Dear WAI, I need clarification on *2.3.1 Info & Relationships*. Can you tell me if my interpretation is correct: I think it is possible to pass WCAG 2.0 SC 1.3.1 without using ARIA landmarks. As much as I love ARIA landmarks...I do not think they are required in WCAG 2.0. I always recommend them, but I don't currently have my team call a WCAG 2.0 violation on SC 1.3.1 if ARIA landmarks are missing. Thanks in advance for your insight (as you might guess, the Deque Accessibility Experts are not in agreement in how to interpret this). Best, Glenda -- glenda sims | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 16:35:21 UTC