- From: Devarshi Pant <devarshipant@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:54:22 -0400
- To: akirkpat@adobe.com
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJGQbjs5nUjkHV_aovUQcEucLkbRnvC93tEiKT7cANnkHBoNWw@mail.gmail.com>
In G88, under Description, please refer to the text towards the end that reads: <quote> It may also be helpful for the title to - >Identify the site or other resource to which the Web page belongs >Be unique within the site or other resource to which the Web page belongs. </quote> Now compare this, especially the first bullet above, with the Intent under SC 2.4.8 that says: "The intent of this Success Criterion is to provide a way for the user to orient herself within a set of Web pages, a Web site, or a Web application and find related information." *** It seems that the title on a specific webpage can convey the larger context (series of steps, drill down navigational scheme, etc.) using G88, and therefore it can be considered as a sufficient technique to satisfy SC 2.4.8. Devarshi On Aug 20, 2013 2:40 PM, <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > Dear Devarshi Pant , > > The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the > comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the > Understanding WCAG 2.0 (Public Review Draft) published on 11 Jul 2013. > Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us > comments! > > The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. > > Please review it carefully and let us know by email at > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 25 August > 2013. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific > solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a > consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a > formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the > transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation > Track. > > Thanks, > > For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group, > Michael Cooper > W3C Staff Contact > > 1. > > http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJGQbjvU6dHvCbnGYK2_vbCMY-aAWXNckN4S0pUuYfr8pUEusA@mail.gmail.com > 2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2013/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20130711/ > > > ===== > > Your comment on : > > Understanding SC 2.4.8 at > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-location.html > > > > Problem: > > The existing set of techniques could include the page title (G88) as a > > sufficient / advisory technique. > > > > Proposed Change: > > Using page title also serves to orient users on their location. Use > > G88: > > Providing descriptive titles for Web pages > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/G88 as a > > sufficient > > technique under SC 2.4.8. If the editors feel that the length of the > > page > > title string cannot be accommodated in the title bar, consider using > > this > > as an advisory. > > > > -Devarshi > > > Working Group Resolution (LC-2798): > The WG thanks you for your comment. Technique G88 applies to a single web > page, whereas the intent of SC2.4.8 is to allow the user to determine > location within a larger context than a single web page (for example, a > series of web pages). Therefore, the inclusion of G88 as a > sufficient/advisory technique for SC2.4.8 does not seem warranted, because > title contents themselves may not give location information to a user > within a larger website or web application. However, we intend to develop > a future technique which suggests how to implement page titles in a way > which can address SC2.4.8. > > ---- > > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 23:54:50 UTC