- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:19:55 -0700
- To: Les Delaney <lesdelaney@oneseniors.com.au>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 22:20:22 UTC
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Les Delaney <lesdelaney@oneseniors.com.au>wrote: > ** > P L E A S E make the suggestion to webpage designers to be carefull of > their colour choices! > > Light grey - light blue and other pale colours on pale and white > bacgrounds ARE JUST IMPOSSIBLE TO READ for people with dyslexia and poor > eyesight. WHY do they persist in making life a misery for these people? > PLEASE have the designers make better choices!!!! > > Regards > > Les Delaney > lesdelaney@oneseniors.com.au > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ We agree that many websites introduce serious accessibility problems with their color choices. If webpage designers are meeting WCAG 2.0, they will be providing sufficient contrast for text. Success Criterion 1.4.3 require a contrast of at least 4.5 to 1 for text. Please let website owners know that they are causing you problems, and refer them to WCAG 2.0 for guidance on how to provide more accessible content. We don't have any way of identifying or commenting to individual violators. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 22:20:22 UTC