- From: <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:17:04 +0000
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Mark Rogers Email: mark.rogers@powermapper.com Affiliation: PowerMapper Software Document: TD Item Number: H4 Part of Item: Examples Comment Type: technical Summary of Issue: H4 Example 3 seems to fail the test procedure in F44 Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): I can see what example 3 is trying to demonstrate, but if this example is used verbatim I think it would lead to a failure (because the tab order doesn't match the presentation order) Worth noting that H4 example 3 is also almost identical to F44 failure example 1 (so it's pretty confusing) Proposed Change: Perhaps adding some CSS classes that imply layout is different from source order would make this clearer: <a href="" class="topNav" tabindex="1">one</a> <a href="" class="subNav" tabindex="2">three</a> <a href="" class="topNav" tabindex="1">two</a> <a href="" class="subNav" tabindex="2">four</a> The other alternative would be placing the code in table like example 1.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:17:06 UTC