W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > March 2012

H4 Example 3 seems to fail the test procedure in F44

From: <noreply@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:17:04 +0000
Message-Id: <E1S9x3o-00058E-HY@crusher.w3.org>
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Mark Rogers
Email: mark.rogers@powermapper.com
Affiliation: PowerMapper Software
Document: TD
Item Number: H4
Part of Item: Examples
Comment Type: technical
Summary of Issue: H4 Example 3 seems to fail the test procedure in F44
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
I can see what example 3 is trying to demonstrate, but if this example is used verbatim I think it would lead to a failure (because the tab order doesn't match the presentation order)

Worth noting that H4 example 3 is also almost identical to F44 failure example 1 (so it's pretty confusing)




Proposed Change:
Perhaps adding some CSS classes that imply layout is different from source order would make this clearer:

<a href="" class="topNav" tabindex="1">one</a>
<a href="" class="subNav" tabindex="2">three</a>
<a href="" class="topNav" tabindex="1">two</a>
<a href="" class="subNav" tabindex="2">four</a> 

The other alternative would be placing the code in table like example 1.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:17:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC