Re: Expected Results

It'll be clearer.

However, one of them can be true for a button. For example, if #2 is
true for the button, #3 can't be true.
Though I might be misunderstanding....


2011/10/1 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>:
> It is confusing because of the "If" clauses on checks 2 and 3. Is it clearer
> if we also change the first check:
> 1. If a button has a text label, confirm that it correctly describes the
> button's purpose.
>
> Then we still want all 3 to be true, right?
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
> <makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Loretta,
>>
>> I had to say:
>> Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, OR #3 is true. "
>>
>> Because they can't be the multiple selections in any case. It must be
>> a threefold choice.
>>
>>
>> 2011/10/1 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>:
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:09 AM,  <noreply@w3.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Name: Makoto Ueki
>> >> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
>> >> Affiliation: WAIC (Japan) / Infoaxia, Inc.
>> >> Document: TD
>> >> Item Number: FLASH27
>> >> Part of Item: Tests
>> >> Comment Type: general comment
>> >> Summary of Issue: Expected Results
>> >> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>> >> Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, or #3 are true. "
>> >>
>> >> Proposed Change:
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi, Makoto,
>> >
>> > Can you clarify the problem? The Expected Results for FLASH27 are
>> >
>> > * Checks #1, #2, and #3 are true.
>> >
>> > (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20101014/FLASH27.html )
>> >
>
>

Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 22:39:18 UTC