W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Expected Results

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:42:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZ=Wg0ZZx6TJTXT0CQb9peSy7PcUvZiipew2oz+UiiL-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc." <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Logically,
  if FALSE then TRUE

So anytime the if clause is not true, the check is true.

But I agree that this can be confusing. I wonder if there is a better way to
state these conditions.


On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. <
makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote:

> It'll be clearer.
>
> However, one of them can be true for a button. For example, if #2 is
> true for the button, #3 can't be true.
> Though I might be misunderstanding....
>
>
> 2011/10/1 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>:
> > It is confusing because of the "If" clauses on checks 2 and 3. Is it
> clearer
> > if we also change the first check:
> > 1. If a button has a text label, confirm that it correctly describes the
> > button's purpose.
> >
> > Then we still want all 3 to be true, right?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
> > <makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Loretta,
> >>
> >> I had to say:
> >> Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, OR #3 is true. "
> >>
> >> Because they can't be the multiple selections in any case. It must be
> >> a threefold choice.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2011/10/1 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>:
> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:09 AM,  <noreply@w3.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Name: Makoto Ueki
> >> >> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> >> >> Affiliation: WAIC (Japan) / Infoaxia, Inc.
> >> >> Document: TD
> >> >> Item Number: FLASH27
> >> >> Part of Item: Tests
> >> >> Comment Type: general comment
> >> >> Summary of Issue: Expected Results
> >> >> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> >> >> Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, or #3 are true. "
> >> >>
> >> >> Proposed Change:
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hi, Makoto,
> >> >
> >> > Can you clarify the problem? The Expected Results for FLASH27 are
> >> >
> >> > * Checks #1, #2, and #3 are true.
> >> >
> >> > (See
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20101014/FLASH27.html )
> >> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 22:42:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:55 UTC