- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:28:56 -0700
- To: "Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc." <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 22:29:20 UTC
It is confusing because of the "If" clauses on checks 2 and 3. Is it clearer if we also change the first check: 1. If a button has a text label, confirm that it correctly describes the button's purpose. Then we still want all 3 to be true, right? On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. < makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Loretta, > > I had to say: > Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, OR #3 is true. " > > Because they can't be the multiple selections in any case. It must be > a threefold choice. > > > 2011/10/1 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:09 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > >> > >> Name: Makoto Ueki > >> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > >> Affiliation: WAIC (Japan) / Infoaxia, Inc. > >> Document: TD > >> Item Number: FLASH27 > >> Part of Item: Tests > >> Comment Type: general comment > >> Summary of Issue: Expected Results > >> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > >> Expected Results should be "Checks #1, #2, or #3 are true. " > >> > >> Proposed Change: > >> > > > > Hi, Makoto, > > > > Can you clarify the problem? The Expected Results for FLASH27 are > > > > * Checks #1, #2, and #3 are true. > > > > (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20101014/FLASH27.html ) > > >
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 22:29:20 UTC