- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:29:09 -0700
- To: andrew@w3.org
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikhMQPArfGiUrFi+o_yF6QJhXb_frhC9CG1-7x-@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:35 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > > Name: Andrew Arch > Email: andrew@w3.org > Affiliation: W3C > Document: UW > Item Number: Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.2 > Part of Item: Sufficient Techniques > Comment Type: general comment > Summary of Issue: techniques link to 20081211 version > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Many techniques in the Understanding doc (e.g. from > http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/media-equiv-captions.html) seem > to link to the 2001/11 version of the Techniques (eg > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G93) rather than the > latest release (ie http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/) > > Proposed Change: > Update links to always link to "Latest Version" > > ============================== == Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you for pointing this out. These shouldn't refer to latest versions, because there may be changes in one that's only meaningful when viewed in light of the change in another. However, the links should have been to the correct updated version, and we will fix this. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 17:29:39 UTC