public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from January 2011 by thread

SCR19 applies to SC 3.2.2 too Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 31 January)

Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG Tomas Caspers (Saturday, 29 January)

Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG Tomas Caspers (Thursday, 20 January)

H82 missing? noreply@w3.org (Wednesday, 19 January)

Requirement for 200% text increase nearly impossilbe to meet in most cases noreply@w3.org (Tuesday, 18 January)

Test needs specification of window size and criteria for compliance noreply@w3.org (Tuesday, 18 January)

Check for CSS seems less useful than test for use of deprecated elements (e.g., font, center, strike, i, b, u) noreply@w3.org (Monday, 10 January)

Test contradicts other options to meet SC 1.4.4 noreply@w3.org (Monday, 10 January)

Test for percent is in itself not meaningful, should encompass %, em, font size names noreply@w3.org (Monday, 10 January)

use of fieldset should not be required for any group of logically related input elements noreply@w3.org (Thursday, 6 January)

Test whether all th Elements have scope attribute misleading noreply@w3.org (Thursday, 6 January)

Equivalence of content of noembed element not explicitly checked noreply@w3.org (Tuesday, 4 January)

The test for the correct use of longdesc should be conditional on its application noreply@w3.org (Tuesday, 4 January)

Test does not check top position of link or mechanism noreply@w3.org (Monday, 3 January)

The test should include a check whether the function to turn off blinking content is documented noreply@w3.org (Monday, 3 January)

Last message date: Monday, 31 January 2011 02:12:57 UTC