W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2010

RE: Lack of showing amendments

From: Sheena McCullagh <sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:22:33 +0100
To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <KNEOJNIMDPHDGIPDGJGMCEAGEJAA.sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk>
Many thanks for this, but I'm now more confused.  When you follow the links
from http://www.w3.org/WAI/ and http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/comments/ and
http://www.w3.org/News/2010#entry-8851 they don't take you through to the
diff marked versions, but to the 8 July versions which aren't diff marked.

In fact I couldn't find a link on the web site to the diff marked versions
at all.

I note the diff marked versions are dated as June 2010, whereas the ones
without the diff marks are dated 8 July.

It was these latter ones, which are the ones comment has been invited on via
the web site, which I was suggesting ought to be diff marked, not the ones
you sent me links for and which I couldn't find on the web site.

Hence my original suggestion still stands.

Sheena

-----Original Message-----
From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
Sent: 30 July 2010 21:57
To: sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Subject: Re: Lack of showing amendments


On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM,  <sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Name: Sheena McCullagh
> Email: sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk
> Affiliation: Member of the public
> Document: W2
> Item Number: (none selected)
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: general comment
> Summary of Issue: Lack of showing amendments
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> Some of us struggle to spot changes/proof read.  It would therefore have
been exceptionally useful if the amendments/changes in the 8 July drafts had
been marked to show the differences between those documents and the existing
WAIG2.
>
> Proposed Change:
> Please mark amendments/changes in some way - including where you have
'repaired' broken links.
>
================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
The draft documents released for public review contain links to
diff-marked versions:

Understanding WCAG 2.0, Single file diff-marked version showing
revisions since 11 December 2008,
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100708/complete-diff
.html

Techniques for WCAG 2.0, Single file diff-marked version showing
revisions since 11 December 2008,
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100708/complete-diff.html

Unfortunately, the diff mark-up will not catch links whose only change
is to their targets.

While we believe that all links were reviewed and were either working
or removed when the draft documents were released, we have no way of
ensuring that those links continue to stay unbroken.


Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 30 July 2010 21:22:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:13 UTC