- From: Jens Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:20:15 +0200
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
> http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-refs.html I noticed two issues: * “The alt text for the icon is null”—wouldn’t “empty” be a little bit more understandable as “null” doesn’t seem to reflect common lingo? * Typo: “describedby”. Other than that I cannot but feel a bit uncomfortable around “link purpose,” as the purpose of a link is usually always the same, referring to another resource. Thus, I wonder if for instance “link target” wouldn’t have been a little bit clearer, considering that after all, this criterion is about user expectations. -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 17:21:10 UTC