- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:02:13 -0500
- To: Chris Reeve <chrisreeve15@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-Id: <96515E6F-3692-45D1-947D-F6CCD32DF38A@trace.wisc.edu>
Hi Chris The WCAG working group meets every two weeks. At that time we take up items that have been prepared by group members out of our worklist. Your questions have been added to the list and will be addressed in their turn. I'm afraid the working group's charter is to work on the guidelines and support materials. But we are not set up to be a consulting organization. We welcome questions where the support materials for WCAG are not clear -- and we look at each and every one to see if an wording in the support materials needs to be adjusted or added to make the materials clearer. We are NOT able to give advice to people on how to make their web pages or sites conform. There are many good consultants and materials out there on that topic. In order to not show favoritism or refer only to those people we know - WCAG does not make recommendations for who to see. But what I would do is ask around and see who respects whose work - and then select one. Several of your questions are in the category where we are looking at them to see how we can improve the support materials. As these are completed we will both send you the result and change our support materials. Other of your inquiries were of the type - how do I do this? We refer you to the Techniques documents -- or to consultants as above. It is not that we wouldn't like to respond to every query, but we simply cannot. Too many, and we are only volunteers working on this in addition to our full time (and double time) jobs. I hope you understand. Continue to send in queries where you think the current documentation has errors or is unclear. Also, if in working with consultants you come up with new techniques that are not currently documented, please (everyone) write them up and send them in so we can include them for others. Thanks. Gregg ----------------------- WCAG Co-Chair On Jul 10, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Chris Reeve wrote: > I have a page that has a link. The link goes to a different page. > The second page is an image with an alt tag. The first page is the > title of the link. > > Does this pass 2.4.4? > > If not, what can I do to pass 2.4.4? > > I also asked a question about Meaningful Sequence for letter- > spacing. This has not been answered yet. >
Received on Saturday, 11 July 2009 16:02:55 UTC