- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:07:29 -0600
- To: stenitzer@wienfluss.net
- CC: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi Michael, Thanks for your comments on WCAG 2.0. I was hoping you could provide some additional details related to the comment below on semantic classes and IDs. Can you tell me a bit more about the specific changes you'd like to see? Looking at the source, I see that there are some discrepancies between the class names and ids used in the Quick Reference vs. the Understanding Document, but I'm unsure whether making them match would fully address your concerns. Thanks much, -Ben Michael Stenitzer wrote: > Name: Michael Stenitzer > Email: stenitzer@wienfluss.net > Affiliation: WIENFLUSS > Document: UW > Item Number: (none selected) > Part of Item: Intent > Comment Type: editorial > Summary of Issue: HTML Version of Understanding WCAG with semantic classes and IDs > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Please provide semantic classes and IDs as in the quick reference to allow automatic formatting selection mechanisms to work with Understanding WCAG 2.0 like in the quick-reference. > > Proposed Change: > > > -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 23:07:55 UTC