- From: Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:07:22 +0100
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi, When we evaluated test case sc1.4.1_l1_011 [1] for technique G14, we thought that the second example in that technique fails the success criterion. The example describes the use of text alternatives on colour icons (for coding the tracks in a conference). The text alternative is not good enough (as the test procedure points out) because that is conditional content; the SC requires that the colour-coded information is "simultaneously visually evident". That is not the case for alternative text. So example 2 appears to fail both the test procedure and the success criterion. Proposal: Remove example 2 (or modify it?). [1] http://www.bentoweb.org/ts/XHTML1_TestSuite3/metadata/sc1.4.1_l1_011 Best regards, Christophe Strobbe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Friday, 1 February 2008 20:15:05 UTC