- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:30:14 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Carlos Iglesias Email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org Affiliation: FundaciĆ³n CTIC Document: W2 Item Number: Success Criterion 1.4.9 Part of Item: Comment Type: technical Summary of Issue: Criteria to evaluate essential things Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): The criteria to decide whether something is essential is really ambiguous (specially when you are dealing width graphic designers ;o). For example, could the use of an image for the presentation of text using some \"non-standard\" font on headers to follow the \"look & feel\" of a specific brand be considered essential for the information conveyed? (Note that if you say no you are saying that the look & feel of a brand doesn\'t convey any information) Proposed Change:
Received on Friday, 1 February 2008 13:30:22 UTC