W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2008

non w3c techiques have to be named with clear examples

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:26:35 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080201102635.335E35F70B@stu.w3.org>

Name: Maria Putzhuber
Email: mp@putzhuber.net
Affiliation: putzhuber.net
Document: UW
Item Number: (none selected)
Part of Item: Techniques
Comment Type: general comment
Summary of Issue: non w3c techiques have to be named with clear examples 
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
it is a bit frustrating, that the understanding documents don´t give any advice where it is needed the most. 

the wai doesn´t have to provide all the techniques, but common non w3c formats have to be mentioned at least. 

we need clear statements and examples, like:

PDF has to be tagged.

for Level A this is probably too ambitious, as long as the tagging software isn´t better.

so a clear statement of the wai is needed, if pdf has to fulfill 1.3.1 or not.

Flash has to fullfill the requirements of several sc ....

Proposed Change:
giving more examples of non w3c formats
Received on Friday, 1 February 2008 10:26:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:46 UTC