Re: Request for Response

Hi,

here is my response regarding your comment :

----

1) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0086.html
Yes the problem I speak about is colored text referring to a colored object.

2) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0087.html
ok but i think it's a lack maybe a small note about that point can be added

3) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0088.html
ok for the logo exception. Just for my understanding, for example, in a 
case of a company with an orange background and white text logo who 
failed the contrast ratio like http://www.orange.fr/. They can't use the 
same orange background color with white text on it for other element in 
his web design even if it's already in his corporate visual guidelines.

On the Large Print suggestion I agree that the note 4 cover the problem 
of cascading size but my concern is more in the fact that you speak 
about pt instead of px. Can you tell me how you determine easily the 
size in pt of an element when he is rendered with text-size:1cm, or 
text-size:0.77em with a lot of cascading, or text-size:12px. And it's 
even more difficult for image of text if you don't have access to the 
graphic source. Even the CSS 2.1 specification say : Absolute length 
units are only useful when the physical properties of the output medium 
are known (cf : http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#length-units)

4) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0089.html
ok

5) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0090.html
ok

6) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0091.html
ok so I add to declare the change in the language on the single word 
case only for the words who are really clearly with any possible doubt 
in other language and I didn't have to check in at least one dictionary 
of the surrounding language. In that situation I think we can achieve 
really different result in an human evaluation

----

By the way I think there is a case not covered by wcag 1 or 2 or i 
didn't know where, for example :
on a left part a clock picture with an alt attribut "the store A is open 
between 8 and 12", on a right part some information about  adress of the 
store A.
The same with a store B, C, D, etc and on top of all this bocks a 
statement saying  "to know  the  opening hour of the stores move your 
mouse hover the clock picture."

People with keyboard navigation and even those with a browser different 
from IE can't have access to the information

Best regards,

Aurélien Levy
> Dear Aurelien Levy,
>
> On March 21, the WCAG Working Group responded to your additional comments on the
> 11 Dec 2007 Last Call Working Draft of the Web Content Accessibility
> Guidelines 2.0. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Could you let us know  by
> Tuesday, April 8 whether you are satisfied with our resolutions? If
> that date is not possible, please reply to this message indicating
> when you will be able to respond.
>
> If we do not hear from you by Tuesday, April 8, we will assume that
> you are satisfied with the responses to your comments.
>
> Thanks again for the interest that you have taken in these guidelines.
>
> Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact
>
> On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0086.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0087.html
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0088.html
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0089.html
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0090.html
> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Mar/0091.html
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 12 April 2008 11:01:43 UTC