- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:12:48 -0700
- To: "aurélien levy" <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:00 AM, aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr> wrote: > Comment 7: clarifications needed on SC 1.4.5 > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Jan/0007.html > (Issue ID: 2384) > > My first question : "What about the use of font like futura who are not basic web font but near to them? did I need to replace it ?" is on image of text not on text only sorry for that. > > For example, Safari support font embedding but others browsers don't. Even if the future version of others browsers may support it there will still have some old browser out there. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- If you cannot achieve the desired effect, you technically could use an image of text (with a text alternative, of course) in this situation and still meet SC 1.4.5. However, the working group feels that the best approach is to use a cascade, so that users who have the font installed get it, and others get a similar font.
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 23:13:26 UTC