- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:54:27 +0100
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi, here is my comment in regard of the current review for bug 2059 : http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2059 I agree for the company who want to use their own list but the problem is more that you let company claim the accessibility of their own product/technology without any control and with really vague criteria (as number of supported : plateform, AT, browser). I like to be as optimistic as you but I think that the commercial and marketing communication of big company like Adobe, Microsoft is more powerful that the feedback and comment off the small community of accessibility. Can you give me an answer for my last comment : Why, it' s a problem for the WCAG working group (or another w3c group) to maintain a list of accessible technology and not only limited to W3C technology (since the working group is partially composed by employee of non standard technology company it must not be a problem) For my part I think that the support of two different plateform accessibility API (NSAccessibility protocol for OSX and MSAA for example) and the support of two different browser is a minimum to be an accessibility supported technology. Without that minimum the technology can't be used as an accessibility supported technology except the case of using them in a close environment (every user have jaws 8, PC and IE7 for example) Best regards Aurélien Levy
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 10:54:45 UTC