- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:47:38 +0100
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi, here is my comment in regard of the current review for bug 2034 : http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2034 the G142 technique need some rewriting because the commonly available term is not usable I think it must be something like : G142: Using a technology in an closed environment where the used user agents support zoom Technique number 3 : "Providing controls on the Web page that incrementally change the size of the text" need a rewriting too because providing controls is not a guarantee that there is no lost loss of content or functionality." I think it must be something like : 3. Providing controls on the Web page that incrementally change the size of the text and do not cause loss of content or functionality when the text is resized up to 200% or down to 50% Furthermore, You must specify if it's for all the text present in the page or just for a part of it (for example the controls resize the content but not the navigation bar). So it become something like : 3. Providing controls on the Web page that incrementally change the size of all the text and do not cause loss of content or functionality when the text is resized up to 200% or down to 50% Finally, I think there is a need for another technique like : "Using measurements that are relative to other measurements for the text sizing AND ensuring that there is no loss of content or functionality when the text is resized up to 200% or down to 50%" to cover the case of text sizing with relative unit and block sizing with absolute unit and because in that case I don't need controls on the web page the resize text By the way, you don't say if the text resizing functionality must be usable with keyboard only. For example, there is a native zoom feature in the flash player but it's accessible only with the right click on a mouse. Did that mean that every flash animation must have text resizing controls in the animation by itself ? Best regards A.Levy
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 10:48:14 UTC