- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:38:00 -0500
- To: 'Loretta Guarino Reid' <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Thank you I accept your response to my comment. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 11:31 PM > To: Gregg Vanderheiden > Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org > Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft of May, 2007 > > Dear Gregg Vanderheiden, > > Thank you for your comments on the 17 May 2007 Public Working > Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG > 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/). The WCAG > Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the May > draft, and will be publishing an updated Public Working Draft > shortly. Before we do that, we would like to know whether we > have understood your comments correctly, and also whether you > are satisfied with our resolutions. > > Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and > reply to us by 19 November 2007 at > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether you are > satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived. Note > also that we are not asking for new issues, nor for an > updated review of the entire document at this time. > > Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted > and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a > link to the archived copy of your original comment on > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/, > and may also include links to the relevant changes in the > WCAG 2.0 Editor's Draft of May-October 2007 at > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/ > > Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. > Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter > requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development > of WCAG 2.0. > > Regards, > > Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair > Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair > Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact > > On behalf of the WCAG Working Group > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 1: Clarify wording of SC 2.4.4 > Source: > http:/http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag > 20/2007Jun/0173.html > (Issue ID: 2020) > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Some people were confused by 2.4.4 thinking it meant you > needed to be able to determine purpose from the link text and > also from the context. > > Proposed Change: > add "taken together" at end to it reads > > 2.4.4 Link Purpose (Context): The purpose of each link can be > determined from the link text and its programmatically > determined link context taken together. > > or > > 2.4.4 Link Purpose (Context): The purpose of each link can be > determined from the link text together wih its > programmatically determined link context. > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > We have changed SC 2.4.4 to read "2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context): > The purpose of each link can be determined from the link text > alone, or from the link text together with its > programmatically determined link context, except where the > purpose of the link would be ambiguous to users in general." >
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 04:38:18 UTC