W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > November 2007

RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft of May, 2007

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:38:00 -0500
To: 'Loretta Guarino Reid' <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Message-id: <00f501c81e9c$7b22f880$166fa8c0@NC84301>

Thank you

I accept your response to my comment.


Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 11:31 PM
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden
> Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
> Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft of May, 2007
>
> Dear Gregg Vanderheiden,
>
> Thank you for your comments on the 17 May 2007 Public Working
> Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG
> 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/). The WCAG
> Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the May
> draft, and will be publishing an updated Public Working Draft
> shortly. Before we do that, we would like to know whether we
> have understood your comments correctly, and also whether you
> are satisfied with our resolutions.
>
> Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and
> reply to us by 19 November 2007 at
> public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether you are
> satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived. Note
> also that we are not asking for new issues, nor for an
> updated review of the entire document at this time.
>
> Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted
> and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a
> link to the archived copy of your original comment on
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/,
> and may also include links to the relevant changes in the
> WCAG 2.0 Editor's Draft of May-October 2007 at
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/
>
> Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments.
> Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter
> requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development
> of WCAG 2.0.
>
> Regards,
>
> Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact
>
> On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Comment 1: Clarify wording of SC 2.4.4
> Source:
> http:/http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag
> 20/2007Jun/0173.html
> (Issue ID: 2020)
> ----------------------------
> Original Comment:
> ----------------------------
>
> Some people were confused by 2.4.4 thinking it meant you
> needed to be able to determine purpose from the link text and
> also from the context.
>
> Proposed Change:
> add  "taken together" at end to it reads
>
> 2.4.4 Link Purpose (Context): The purpose of each link can be
> determined from the link text and its programmatically
> determined link context taken together.
>
> or
>
> 2.4.4 Link Purpose (Context): The purpose of each link can be
> determined from the link text together wih its
> programmatically determined link context.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> We have changed SC 2.4.4 to read "2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context):
> The purpose of each link can be determined from the link text
> alone, or from the link text together with its
> programmatically determined link context, except where the
> purpose of the link would be ambiguous to users in general."
>
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 04:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:09 UTC