- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 21:19:33 -0700
- To: "David MacDonald" <befree@magma.ca>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Dear David MacDonald, Thank you for your comments on the 17 May 2007 Public Working Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/). The WCAG Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the May draft, and will be publishing an updated Public Working Draft shortly. Before we do that, we would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly, and also whether you are satisfied with our resolutions. Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us by 19 November 2007 at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether you are satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived. Note also that we are not asking for new issues, nor for an updated review of the entire document at this time. Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived copy of your original comment on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/, and may also include links to the relevant changes in the WCAG 2.0 Editor's Draft of May-October 2007 at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/ Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development of WCAG 2.0. Regards, Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group ---------------------------------------------------------- Comment 1: Abbreviation examples Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jul/0026.html (Issue ID: 2317) ---------------------------- Original Comment: ---------------------------- I read this on a review of WCAG. "The minor drawback is that in the examples provided, they define KISS (Keep is Simple Stupid) as an initialism, despite the fact it's pronounced as a word, and WWW (World Wide Web) as an acronym when no-one in their right minds would try to pronounce it as a word." Proposed Change: Find a different initialism and Acronym... Make KISS the Acronym. in Example 3,4 of H28 Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 01:49:00 GMT --------------------------------------------- Response from Working Group: --------------------------------------------- Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency. We have change the title of example 3 to "Using the acronym element to expand an acronym", and the title of example 4 to: "Using the acronym element to expand an initialism".
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 04:19:54 UTC