Re: Comment LC-1118

This is now SC 3.3.2.

Loretta

On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote:
> I don't see a 2.5.2
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:32 AM
> To: Gian Sampson-Wild
> Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comment LC-1118
>
> This referred to SC 2.5.2:  If an input error is detected and
> suggestions for correction are known and can be provided without
> jeopardizing the security or purpose of the content, the suggestions
> are provided to the user.
>
> Loretta
>
> On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote:
> > Comment 91:
> >
> > Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
> > (Issue ID: LC-1118)
> >
> > Examples: The two examples should be moved to Advisory Techniques
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > Response from Working Group:
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > The working group believes that these examples are just specific instances
> > of some of the already listed future advisory techniques. There are many
> > ways of meeting this success criterion and we don't want to give undue
> > weight to particular instances by providing advisory techniques about some
> > methods and not others.
> >
> > The example titled "Additional Help for Correcting An Input Error" would
> be
> > covered in the "Displaying errors and suggestions in the context of the
> > original form (for example, re-displaying a form where input errors and
> > suggestions for correction are highlighted and displayed in the context of
> > the original form)" technique.
> >
> > The example about correcting the input of months would be covered in the
> > technique titled, "Providing a text message that contains information
> about
> > the number of input errors, suggestions for corrections for each item, and
> > instructions on how to proceed".
> > ----------------------------
> > Response from GSW:
> > ----------------------------
> > Can you please remind me as to which SC this refers to?
> >
> >
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:22:14 UTC