W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

RE: Comment LC-1118

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:14:37 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007e01c7bfe8$c20c6aa0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

I don't see a 2.5.2

-----Original Message-----
From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:32 AM
To: Gian Sampson-Wild
Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comment LC-1118

This referred to SC 2.5.2:  If an input error is detected and
suggestions for correction are known and can be provided without
jeopardizing the security or purpose of the content, the suggestions
are provided to the user.


On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote:
> Comment 91:
> Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
> (Issue ID: LC-1118)
> Examples: The two examples should be moved to Advisory Techniques
> ----------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ----------------------------
> The working group believes that these examples are just specific instances
> of some of the already listed future advisory techniques. There are many
> ways of meeting this success criterion and we don't want to give undue
> weight to particular instances by providing advisory techniques about some
> methods and not others.
> The example titled "Additional Help for Correcting An Input Error" would
> covered in the "Displaying errors and suggestions in the context of the
> original form (for example, re-displaying a form where input errors and
> suggestions for correction are highlighted and displayed in the context of
> the original form)" technique.
> The example about correcting the input of months would be covered in the
> technique titled, "Providing a text message that contains information
> the number of input errors, suggestions for corrections for each item, and
> instructions on how to proceed".
> ----------------------------
> Response from GSW:
> ----------------------------
> Can you please remind me as to which SC this refers to?
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:14:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC